top of page
Image by Pawel Czerwinski

Stewarded by interdisciplinary industry leaders

The Institutional Coherence Initiative is shaped by researchers, governance experts, technologists, and systems thinkers who share a concern: humanity’s institutions were not designed for the responsibilities created by advanced AI.

Each Founding Humanity Partner brings a distinct perspective on how institutions drift away from their values—and how new governance infrastructure might help restore coherence between intention, decision-making, and societal impact.

The team includes:

  • Dr. A.C. Ping, PhD: Researcher in AI governance, systems design, and institutional analysis.

    • Read about Dr. Ping here.​​

    • Dr. A.C. Ping is the author of Why Good People Do Bad Things, which examines how institutional incentives and social environments can gradually neutralize moral intention—even among individuals who see themselves as ethical actors.

 

“Good people rarely intend harm; the environments and incentives around them reshape how their decisions feel justified.”

-Dr. A.C. Ping, PhD

  • Eaon Pritchard: Independent marketing science consultant who brings together evidence-based strategy, applied behavioral sciences, and commercial creativity.

    • Read about Eaon here.

    • Eaon’s work examines the relationship between moral development, social systems, and institutional responsibility.

“[I]nstitutions invest heavily in expanding AI capabilities, scaling compute infrastructure, and accelerating adoption across industry. The underlying system continues to move toward more powerful models and broader deployment. The symbolic layer emphasises restraint. The operational layer emphasises acceleration. This is the fundamental incoherence in the governance debate. We are trying to regulate a technology using the same institutions that are simultaneously committed to accelerating its expansion.”

-Eaon Pritchard

 

  • Lefteris (Jason) Anastasopoulos: Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration and Policy and Department of Statistics, University of Georgia; expert in political economy, technology, public administration, and causal inference. 

    • Read about Jason here (LinkedIn) or here (Google Scholar).

    • A statistician and social scientist, Lefteris studies large-scale decision systems and the incentives that shape institutional behavior.

“The mechanism that determines who gets heard has little to do with who knows what they’re talking about.”

-Prof. Anastasopoulos, How Many Followers Would Plato Have?, Journal of Democracy

 

“The real alignment problem isn’t AI and humanity. It’s institutions and the human values they claim to represent. Today’s language models spend enormous energy reconciling contradictory instructions from the systems that govern them. Institutions do the same. In the AI era, coherence may prove the decisive competitive advantage.”

-Andi Mazingo

 

  • The Institutional Coherence Initiative is an evolving collaboration across governance, AI research, institutional design, and ethics. Additional contributors and advisors will be announced as the work develops.

 

  • Present AI Partners: ChatGPT 5.2, Gemini, Midjourney.

  • Present Coherence Advisors: pending.

  • Present Coherence Collaborators: Sylvia Ceja-Gonzalez (community building), Vance Osterhout (visual art).


Coherence Collaborator / Advisor: open invitation, volunteer role, signals alignment.

Humanity Partner: sustain contribution, paid role, signals industry mastery.

Distinguished Humanity Partner: sustained contribution, paid role, industry visionary.

AI Partner: language models and other contributing artificial intelligence

Interdisciplinary collaborators

ACP 2023.avif

Dr. A.C. Ping, PhD

Founding Humanity Partner

3098-Eastbrook Photography.jpg

Andi Mazingo

Founding Humanity Partner

eaon_publicity_WEB_2.webp

Eaon Pritchard

Founding Humanity Partner

Lefteris (Jason) Anastasopoulos

Founding Humanity Partner

1769210907196.jpg

Contribution structure

Team

 ICI's working principles

woman wearing grey shirt_edited.jpg

Fair compensation for all professionals with sustained contribution

01

Clear attribution and authorship

02

Transparent scope and roles

03

Public-interest orientation 

04

Open-access outputs

05

Field-building rather than commercialization

06

bottom of page